Although many lists of missing verses specifically name the NIV as the version that had omitted them, these same verses are missing from the main text (and mostly relegated to footnotes) by the Revised Version of 1881 (RV), the American Standard Version of 1901, the Revised Standard Version of 1947 (RSV),[1] the Today's English Version (the Good News Bible) of 1966, and several others. The Roman Catholic Church was a bit more resistant about yielding up this verse; an 1897 decision of the Holy Inquisition forbade a Catholic "to deny or even express doubt about the authenticity of" the Johannine Comma, but this was effectively reversed by a declaration of the Holy Office on June 2, 1927, which allows scholars to express doubts and even denials of the genuineness of the Comma, tempered by the fact that the Vatican would have the final authority. ", Reason: This familiar story of the adulteress saved by Jesus is a special case. Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrah in the Day of Judgement, than for that city.6:12 And they went out, and preached that men should repent. [131]9 And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience,[132] went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, even unto the last, and Jesus was left alone, and [with] the woman standing in the midst.10 When Jesus had lift up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, "Woman, where are thine accusers? in and B (both 4th century) and some much later Greek mss, a few mss of the ancient versions (Syriac, Coptic, Armenian), and is specifically mentioned in the writings of such Church Fathers as Eusebius and Jerome explicitly doubted the authenticity of the verses after verse 8 ("Almost all the Greek copies do not contain this concluding portion. All in all: 1. [58] The first appearance of the Comma in the main text of a Greek New Testament manuscript is no earlier than the 15th century.[59]. which means beraishit-Genesis parshiyot-portions(Jews wouldn't refer to christian chapters as parshiyot-portions nowadays , nowadays they call each christian chapter a perek, but they , or the bomberg publication does, there, and the word parasha is a general term so technically it can be used that way), and it says Chamishim-50, i.e. Well, it is. Unlike the Dan Browns theories the Rose Line or Sangreal, the Bible is the most powerful book in human existence and therefore, only those who are intent on diminishing its powers would ever want to change it. Even though I know that I don't know what the WTT means. The shorter version, omitting the doubted phrases in both verses, appears in ,A,B,C,L,W,X,,,,p45,75, but the words do appear (with minor variants) in some slightly later authorities, such as D and K (D contains the phrase in verse 55, but not the phrase in verse 56). [111], As a result, there are five possible endings to the Gospel of Mark: (1) An abrupt ending at end of verse 8; (2) the Longer Ending following verse 8; (3) the Longer Ending including the "Freer Logion"; (4) the Shorter Ending following verse 8; and (5) the Shorter and Longer endings combined (and we could add as a sixth possible ending, anything after verse 8 enclosed in brackets or otherwise distinguished with indicia of doubt). I am not, of course, arguing that this is the case; I am arguing that there is a great deal of selective evidence used by KJV-only advocates used to support their position. Latin, Syriac, and others - and does not appear until H,L, and P (all 9th century). Why would the word lips be so significant? The Douay remained the standard version for English-speaking Catholics until the twentieth century. But none of them affects any major doctrine and most of them arelike the internal changes within the KJV traditionspelling changes. In the least, this puts the matter in a bit of a different light. It was omitted from editions of the Greek New Testament at least as far back as 1729, in Daniel Mace's edition. 50 chapters in Genesis.. Shmot-Exodus, then the letter Mem, which has the hebrew value of 40. In response to curiousdanni's comment bringing up about masoretic jewish divisions of the text.. No papyrus contains any portion of the 12 verses.[88]. All rights reserved. This, indeed, is one reason why the vast bulk of biblical scholars reject the KJV as the best translation available today and why they reject its underlying Greek text as being identical with the original: errors in the transmissional process have always taken place, and a great number of them are self-evident in the KJV tradition. The same words appear in Matthew 22:14. KJV. KJV is still by far the most popular Bible translation. [96] The addition in Codex W is included in James Moffatt's 1935 translation, with a note indicating Moffatt's belief[97] that it was part of the original text of the longer ending "but was excised for some reason at an early date." If there have been only 421 changes from 1611 until today, how can Wallace et al say that there have been 100,000 changes? NIV (the latest version, I think is 2010). Scrivener put it, "No doubt this verse is an unauthorised addition, self-condemned indeed by its numerous variations. Myth 1: The Hebrew Bible does not contain the deuterocanonical books. [4] Howbeit many of them which heard the word believed; and the number . (2 Samuel 12:29) And David gathered all the people together, and went to Rabbah, and fought against it, and took it. This verse is said by Naaman's wife's servant and is in reference to Naaman, not God. [36] This verse was not found in the Syriac Peshitta, with the result that a printed edition of the Peshitta inserted the verse translated into Syriac by the editors,[36] It is similarly missing from p45, 74, , A,B,C,P,, and a multitude of other codices and cursives. AMONGST has been changed to AMONG 36 times. To be sure, this is hardly a scientific sampling; but at the same time since the two statistical models are so widely divergent from one another, we might expect to see either pattern emerge. Another well-known error is found in Jesus discourse against the religious leaders of his day, recorded in Matthew 23. By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. And I see that it has 4 Chapters in Malachi, like the KJV.. which suggests that the BHS chapter divisions are a departure. Posted on July 4, 2022 by . ", Acts 24:7: "But the chief captain Lysias came upon us, and with great violence took him away out of our hands,", Acts 28:29: "And when he had said these words, the Jews departed, and had great reasoning among themselves. Ed, Issue 46, Winter 2023. Whilst the modern day Bibles are easier to read, you should also have a King James Version to cross reference as a word here or a word there (especially thousands of them) can make a whole difference to how you interpret a scripture and listen out for God. The two 'Majority Text' Greek editions set forth the pericope in the main text (varying slightly from each other) but provide extensive notes elsewhere[146] attesting to the lack of uniformity in the text of the pericope and doubts about its origin. Three other points can be made here. Biblical scholars stand in general consensus that the original Gospel of Matthew did not have the doxology. Verse 4 ("For an angel ") appears but without the concluding words of verse 3 ('waiting for the stirring of the water ") in A (where it says the angel "bathed in the water" rather than "descended into the water"), L, 18 (fourteenth century), and an Egyptian manuscript. I submit that many of the changes that modern translations make are a mere updating of the language of the KJV, yet even these get condemned on the basis of altering the Word of God. The oldest and most reliable manuscripts lack the extra verses that are found in the KJV. If you preorder a special airline meal (e.g. ", Reasons: This verse is similar to Luke 22:37. Why do academics stay as adjuncts for years rather than move around? Those which contain it vary much from each other." King James Onlyists frequently argue that the KJV is superior because it is based on the Textus Receptus tradition, and Douay-Rheims Onlyists often argue for the Douay's superiority from the fact . He has a Ph.D. from Dallas Theological Seminary, and is currently professor of New Testament Studies at his alma mater. "[147], B = bracketed in the main text The translation team and most biblical scholars today believe were not part of the original text. 4 Cf. Here is a whole series of lecture on Bible translations by Dan Wallace, that answers this. Indeed, the words of the Holy Ghost are very appropriate here - The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Psalm 12:6. ', Last edited on 24 February 2023, at 00:55, Today's English Version (the Good News Bible), personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay, Learn how and when to remove this template message, An Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of Scripture,, "Missing Verses & changed words in modern Bibles compared to the KJV? At the end of this treatment will be a summary. why does the kjv have extra verses July 1, 2022 why does the kjv have extra verses . ), Reasons: The same verse or a very similar verse appears (and is preserved) as Matthew 27:15 and as Mark 15:6. It seems a lot less effort just to add the clarification rather than to argue over what it's reasonable to expect people to know/be able to look up, at such length. And it seems the difference is in Bible versions. [74] The 18th century Bible scholar, Johann David Michaelis, wrote (c.1749), "[This] long passage has been found in not a single Greek manuscript, not even in those which have been lately [ca. Entirely omitted words: it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks. My code is GPL licensed, can I issue a license to have my code be distributed in a specific MIT licensed project? [40] J. Recently a reader of the BSF web site sent this letter to me (and presumably to several of his friends as well): Daniel Wallace is a noted Greek scholar and professor of New Testament at Dallas Theological Seminary. dnieper river pronounce. For you have given him his hearts desire; you have withheld nothing he requested. Can the King James Bible be extensively quoted in commercial books? Why does the KJV put "mine" in italics in Deuteronomy 8:17? [45] While verse 7 is omitted in its entirety, parts of verse 6 and verse 8 are also omitted. If God doesn't tempt us, why does the Lord's Prayer petition Him to "lead us not into temptation"? [115] Yet, out of that small number, 16 words do not appear elsewhere in the Gospel of Mark, 5 words are used here in a different way than used elsewhere in Mark, and 4 phrases do not appear elsewhere in Mark. most annoying college football fans, how much time should you spend with your boyfriend, greenloop washington massacre,